Connect your social media account
Connect with The Independent
Want an ad-free experience? Subscribe to Independent Premium.
“The arguments are that other Americans cannot accept the truth with scientists, models, and climate data. It’s about reducing doubt and undermining public confidence in climate science.”
The Independent employs newspapers around the world to actually produce independent journalism. To help us, please make a contribution.
An article linking climate replenishment to Earth’s solar orbit went viral last year, accumulating 4.2 million perspectives on social media and widely shared on Facebook. It’s the most committed weather story in 2019, according to Brandwatch.
There’s only 1 problem. That’s not true.
Facebok removed the object from Natural News, a far-right conspiracy medium with 3 million followers, after it reported.
Share the story, not just the headlines
But the spread of the climate crisis through the group station that rejects climate science continues on Facebok and other social media platforms.
While tech giants have used the game station to suppress or characterize destructive false data from potentigreatest friends about the Covid-1nine pandemic, an obvious acceptance of those who revel in spreading false theories about the climate crisis.
In August, paintings written through two members of the CO2 Coalition were published in the Washington Examiner and published in the Washington Examiner, an unreproving compatibility for the Trump administration’s fossil fuel organization.
The article, which stated that weather models are wrong and that climate replenishment has been greatly exaggerated, was first described as “false” through five independent scientists who verified the facts, Climate Feedback, who stated that they used “carefully selected” evidence and judged Their clinical credibility. very slow.”
Facebok does not verify content that is still subordinate to dozens of third-party groups. The country’s mis design of a fact checker reduces a story in News Feed and, namely, reduces the number of visits, according to Facebok’s policies.
The CO2 Coalition issued the verdict of lying fact-checkers, calling climate feedback “alarmists” and writing an open letter to Facebok CEO Mark Zuckerberg. They checked to remove the fake tag.
Andy Stone, Facebook’s director of political communications, told the New York Times last week that opinion content on the platform, adding opinion articles, has been exempt from fact-checking since 2016.
Dr. Andrew Dessler, a climatologist at Texas A-M University, was a fact-checker at the CO2 Coalition editorial. He told The Independent: “I’ve been thinking, because of the 2016 election, that social media can also be the best friend to end up tearing society apart. It’s just further evidence that this is the case.”
On May 7, the CO2 Coalition won another “false information” label from data verifiers, this time for a video of a Fox News interview with member Dr. Patrick Michaels, a climatologist who rejects clinical consensus on emerging temperatures. He said UN climate models “expect too much warming.” The clip is available on YouTube and has more than 15,000 views.
Dr. Robert Brulle, professor emeritus and environmental intellectual sociologist at Drexel University, said Facebook movements were “irresponsible.”
“In 2020, helping and encouraging other Americans who distort climate science, knowingly printing their things even after being known through their own Americans as misinformation, is absurd,” Dr. Brulle told The Independent.
“Let’s say, for example, “I think we deserve maximum logical navigation around the Pacific because we’ll fall off the edges of the flat earth,” that’s never a very guilty opinion, as it’s based on a truly correct type statement. It’s silly.”
He added: “Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and to their own deeds.”
Dr. Michael Mann, a prominent professor of atmospheric sciences at Penn State and a member of the National Academy of Sciences, reported that Zuckerberg was Facebok to “exploit his form of plats by spreading misbehavior, adding the denial of weather repositioning.”
A spkesuser from Facebok told The Independent: “Facebok’s third-party data verification program that fights viral misinformation. There is an appeal procedure for publishers to use fact checkers directly to challenge the notes.”
Stone also told The Times that Facebok is a maximum mistake that threatens good fitness and defense, but does not come with weather content.
Yet US government agencies have been unequivocal that the climate crisis poses a serious threat to human health.
The federal government’s most recent national weather assessment report, “State of the Union” on the issue, found that climate degradation exacerbates existing threats of fitness and creates new challenges, exposing more Americans in more dangerous weather and climate conditions. .
The most at risk is the low-income sources of currency in minority communities and the environmental and intellectual justice program of the NAACP civil rights organization.
This week, an investigation through Heated and Popular Info raised questions about a “fake greatest friend” note from Climate Feedback that was cleared of a climate information article published through the right-wing newspaper according to The Daily Wire, after court cases. of the editor who was “censored” and intervened through Republican Congressman Mike Johnson.
According to Facebok’s internal documents, the tech giant’s communications and fact-checking staff agreed with the “most fake friend” label, but they were rejected through the political team, who said their “stakeholders” believed fact verification was “partial.” , which no longer alerts readers to his “biggest fake friend” note, has been shared tens of thousands of times.
Dr. John Cook, Cinput for Climate Change Communication professor at George Mason University and founder of the Skeptical Science website, told The Independent that it is unimaginable to quantify the volumes of erroneous weather data on Facebook.
“A lot of Facebok is a black bok,” he said. “But the reality that Facebok allows this to happen, like the erroneous policy and election data that is freely published, is really dangerous. And Facebok is so opaque about it [which] means we don’t know what influence they have.”
Dr. Co said much of the wrong weather data came from conservative expert groups.
“These are think tanks like CO2 Coalition or Heartland Institute, [the latter] that is, prolific brands of erroneous climate science data, while other large ones tend to specialize in politics.
The Heartland Institute has obtained investments from the fossil fuel industry, the Union of Concerned Scientists.
In a new article, they stated that: “Human-caused climate crisis advocates reject the inconvenient evidence of herbal climate change. They’re thaws.”
Through his research, Dr. Cok has found that climate errors on social media disproportionately influence conservatives and have little influence on liberals.
“The prestige quo is a victory for climate deregulators. If you save other Americans from accepting the revival of the climate or taking actioni indirectly to take over, they succeeded,” he said.
He said a defining feature of misguided data attacks against scientists and opposite science itself.
“The wrong arguments are that other Americans can’t accept the truth with scientists, they can’t accept the truth with the models, they can’t accept the truth with the weather data. It’s about generating doubt and undermining the public’s confidence in weather science.”
The CO2 Coalition advises trump and some Republicans’ leadership, adding Senator Ted Cruz. A founder, Dr. William Happer, served on the National Security Council.
The coalition is on Greenpeace’s list of “Koch-funded climate denial front groups.” Together with the Charles Koch Institute, the non-prohave compatibility organization won the mercer Family Foundation’s investment, a 2016 tax return.
According to Rolling Stone, Koch Industries controls oil refineries and 4,000 km pipeline ethanol plants, while the Mercers are mega-republican donors who staked the far-right site Breitbart, CNBC reported.
The CO2 Coalition, which states on its website that “according to carbon dioxide levels will benefit the compatibility of the next countries”, has intensified its social media presence over the past year.
“All we do is be active all day,” Dr. Rossiter told The Independent.
Following the removal of Facebook data verification in the Washington Examiner article, written through Dr. Rossiter and Dr. Michaels, CO2 Coalition is also able to resume ad acquisition.
Dr. Rossiter said the crowd can also buy classified ads “at cost” and expand their reach.
“We don’t care about readers of The Washington Post on the East Coast when we advertise it and prefer to run our publication, or our publications and prove it to other Americans. We decided on other Americans in Midwest states who can also subscribe to something like the Republican National Committee channel,” he said.
“We take a look and target other Americans who know more, but who are the best naturist friends, no less than accessible through us to be polite. There is never much education in this deception for other Americans firmly committed to one aspect or another.”
Facebook’s global policy chief Monika Bickert told CNN last year that big social media is “never in the news, we’re in the social media business.”
And yet more Americans (35%) receive their facebok news that elsewhere, the Digital News Report 2020, followed via YouTube (24%) Twitter (17%).
The report also found that seven out of ten Americans consider climate replenishment to be a serious problem. However, in the United States, an imperative proportion (12%) disputes are serious, in part because they could be “skeptical about science,” according to the report.
In the case of a big block, Americans who say climate replenishment is never very serious are probably as high for a percentage of their views on climate replenishment through social media or email as those deeply concerned about it. “We see an overly vocal minority that generates a big noise online,” the report says.
Timothy Karr is director of the defense organization Free Press and Free Press Action Fund, which calls for media reshaping and net neutrality. He told The Independent: “Facebok is in an exaggerated position. On the one hand, he says he is doing more than ever to combat misconduct, but also benefits from misconduct through the operation of his advertising model.
He said the most attractive publications on Facebok are “very confrontational or propagate mydest or conspiracy theories.”
“These degrees of engagement generate advertising dollars on Facebook, encouraging the dissumed publications involving other Americans in this unfair way,” he added.
On July 1, a coalition of environmental and political group stations sent a letter to Facebook’s oversight board calling for an offensive against climate denial and stagnant “giant” opinion loop that allows erroneous weather data to be published as an opinion.
“Facebok allows the spread of misinformation from the climate to spread indirectly, uncheckedly, around the world. Instead of following the recommendation of independent scientists and approved climate feedback fact-checkers, Facebok sided with fossil fuel smugglers by allowing CO2 To directly coalition a major flaw” “opinion content.” This loop has allowed the climate denial to become worse by calling it “opinion” and thus avoiding the platform’s fact-checking processes,” they wrote.
More than 500 companies, adding Coca-Cola, Dunkin’s Donuts, Verizon and Disney this week, according to WSJ, have cut or suspended advertising on Facebok as a component of the “Smaximum logical Hate for Profit” boycott, a civil rights initiative. Group play station to force social networks to combat hate speech and misinformation.
An independent Audit of Facebok beyond this month cast harsh conclusions about the social media giant, saying it allowed hate speech and misinformation to proliferate.
On the other hand, Generation Progress, the youth advocacy and study group, announced Thursday a “Get The Facts Out Campaign” website aimed at debugging myths about the climate crisis and weather deniers throughout Congress and the Trump administration, foc on intertwined climate disorders and racial justice.
“African Americans have been fighting for air and blank water in their communities for years. Our legislators perceive the importance of addressing these inequalities, without denying their existence,” the crowd said.
And beyond this month, two senators led the legislature directly to reshape segment 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, Reuters reported.
The legislation, called the Platshape And Consumer Transparency Accountability Act, or PACT, through Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz and Senate Republican John Thune, aims to produce more duties and transparency for primary-generation platshape content moderation decisions.
The bill will require that the ways of generating their content moderation practices in some way be available to consumers, to shape a complaint formula that notifies users of moderation decisions within 1 day and allows them to appeal the decisions.
It is not immunity for known illegal content if corporations are notified and federal regulators initiate civil lawsuits.
Tech giants seem to react to pressure. Google of Alphabet Inc. has announced that it will begin disarming data verification tags in Google Images to search for effects around the world.
Twitter has also brought fact-checking systems and precautionary tags for “manipulated media,” which revel in President Trump’s recent tweets, critics say the measures are too limited in scope.
Climate experts were skeptical about the ability, or preference of generation platforms, to implement meaningful replenishment and said public action was essential.
For Dr. Mann, this indicates political reform. “Americans will have to vote for a Democratic president and congress in the next U.S. election. Unlike Trump and Congressional Republicans, who seem indebted to Russia’s interests and fossil fuels, be prepared to take strong action against Zuckerberg/Facebook’s destructive activities.” Said.
Dr. Cok is an opescore with researchers from learning devices in a formula for tripping and classifying erroneous time data in real time. He stated that the preference of the social media bureaucracy was to encourage such a genre as to “necessarily take coins out of pockets” advertising revenue.
The best-important friend, he says, is “public resistance to misinformation”: training other Americans to detect deceptive or rhetorical techniques and logical errors in climate denial arguments.
“We found that once the techniques are used, it neutralizes and inoculates other Americans not only against this myth, but also against other topics such as tobacco and anti-vaxxer disinformation,” he said.
Dr. Co and his team created a smartphone app for public and school use.
He added: “We have to look for technological solutions, but at the end of the day we prefer to become pirateable.”
Additional Reuters reports
You can check our netpainting regulations in full here.
Create a comment calls the debate
Create a comment calls the debate
Create a comment calls the debate
You can check our netpainting regulations in full here.
Create a comment calls the debate
Create a comment calls the debate
Create a comment calls the debate
Enter your email to follow the most important comments in this article.
Are you required to send this vote?
Do you want to mark this comment as inappropriate?
Want real global problems, connect in the most engaging discussions, and listen to journalists? Start your standalone Premium subscription today.
Do you want to mark this comment as inappropriate?
Are you required to delete this comment?
Do you want your favorite articles and stories for your favorites to read or watch later? Start your standalone Premium subscription today.
Find your favorite Premium Independent section below my profile