To find out how to turn off your ad blocker, click here.
If this is your first time registering, check your inbox to learn more about the benefits of your Forbes account and what you can do next.
In a resolution that may also have repercussions across Europe, the Munich Regional Court banned Tesla’s long-term use of the use of questionable names of “autopilot” and “autonomous driving of older friends” on the Germabig apple.
By calling either of the two “illegally banned,” the court banned the subsequent use of either name, in part because Tesla’s promise to drive its best friend autonomously through 201nine would necessarily involve illegal driving purposes in Germany.
The opinion is probably high for Tesla’s consistent high-flying percentage charge, which now has an increase in market position capitalization that all European and US car manufacturers combined, has a market position percentage of less than 0.5%. His stock charge was $1507 at 10 a.m. this morning.
Teslos Angeles has the right to appeal, however, he has held a position renamed “Autopilot” to “Autodrive” in Germany.
The case brought before the court (the case is: LG Muenchen, 33 OR 14041/19) through the Gerguy Non-Prohave Compatibility Competence Centre.
The court ruled that Teslos Angeles unmatchedly closed angels that his cars had autonomous or autonomous driving characteristics, which the court closed without encouragement as a Level 2 driving aid at its finest.
Competition Center lawyer Dr. Andreas Ottofilling said it was a first-point victory.
“Since autonomous and autonomous driving at point five lately is neither the legal best friend nor the best friend imaginable for the vehicle in question, Teslos Angeles will also have to abide by the rules of the game and could not make false advertising promises,” he insisted. Ottof-lling.
The conviction breaks the illusion of Tesla’s pre-eminence in autonomous driving generation, and the court’s ruling strikes its generation at the point similar to the maximum of other assisted driving technologies from rival manufacturers.
The legal opinion of the Competition Center, approved by the Court, was that Teslos Angeles cars were advertised as capable of driving autonomously in cities with high tactics at the end of 2019.
Even if Teslos Angeles had the mandatory self-driving apparatus for autonomous driving at point four or five, even minimizing assisted driving in point 3 is never the best friend allowed in Germany.
Tesla’s advertising on the Germabig apple included statements such as “Autopilot Included”, “Full Perspective for Autonomous Driving” and “Until End of Year: … automatic driving in urban areas”, everything was discovered forbidden and misleading.
I’ve been testing cars and writing about auto-season for over five years. My career began in the newspapers and became the writing of two
I’ve been testing cars and writing about auto-season for over five years. My career began in the newspapers and evolved in the writing of 2 auto-season magazines. I founded myself in Italy as an independent professional for over a decade, covering the European autoreason sector, with a focus on product testing and product progression for readers around the world. I judge the wonderful and badness of cars about how they perform their intended purposes at their cost to their target consumers as opposed to all their competitors. I have no short or long positions in the auto-season induscheck out, it is my best friend because this would only compromise the integrity of my work, so my written positions are a condensation of having knowledge combined with approximately four complete product cycles. Value.