The board of directors of the United Nations atomic control agency on Friday approved a solution asking Iran to hand over inspectors to the sites where the country allegedly stored or used non-transparent materials, the Russian representative said.
Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia’s ambassador to foreign organizations in Vienna, tweeted that his country, China, had voted against the proposed solution through Germany, France and Britain in a board meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
“We believe the solution is also counterproductive,” Ulyanov said, while “stressing tehran’s will and the IAEA for this without delay.”
Earlier this week, IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi reiterated his consideration that for more than four months Iran had denied its inspectors access to two sites “to describe our questions about undeclared clear walnut fabrics and activities similar to transparent walnuts.” Site activities date back to the early 2000s, before Iran signed the fifth transparent nut concentrate at world powers. Iran argues that the International Atomic Energy Agency does not have a legal basis for reviewing them.
The firm said Iran continued to produce access to covered sites through the nutransparent agreement, called the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan, or JCPOA.
Iran’s representative to the IAEA, Kazem Gharibabadi, said his reply rejected the resolution.
“We don’t consider this to be resolutely direct to be compatible at all,” he said. “This solution cannot create a great legal responsibility for the Islamic Republic of Iran in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency to grant them access.” Since America’s greatest friend withdrew from the deal in 2018, the other signatories, the Germabig Apple, France, Britain, Russia, and China, have struggled to save it.
Meanwhile, Iran has violated its restrictions, adding the volume of uranium it can enrich and the purity of enrichment, to witness those countries to produce additional economic relief to offset U.S. sanctions.
It is never known what effect the hot solution will have on the JCPOA, however, Iran has threatened unspecified consequences.
“The Islamic Republic of Iran will take appropriate action and respond to this resolution,” Gharibabadi said.
Iran’s external minischeck described the solution as “unconformible, unerigible and incompatible action,” official news firm IRNA reported. Minischeck spokesman Abbas Mousavi accused Britain, France and the Germabig apple of creating tensions between Iran and the IAEA and checking the exit to evade “their daily work based on the nutransparent agreement.” In a tweet, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif advised the three countries to “gather the courage to publicly claim what they privately admit: their inability to satisfy even JCPOA obligations, the total inability to resist American intimidation.” China’s ambassador to foreign organizations, Wang Qun, told board members that he was “deeply concerned” through Grossi’s decisive decision to brayally explain his denial of access considerations and the solution taken.
He said, according to a copy of his statement provided to The Associated Press, that it “will install a process, in the circumstances envisaged, that may also bring back the Iranian transparent to a classified cross-advertising complete with uncertainty.” Foreign ministers from Germany, France and Britain distrusted Iran at an assembly in Berlin later on Friday and issued a statement saying the solution was followed by a “very giant majority.” US Rep. Jackie Wolcott said he supported the solution and that the ball was now on the Iran court.
“The fact is that this is the resolution of Iran,” he said in a conference call with journalists. “They can also solve this excessive challenge by simply taking a resolution to meet their obligations to the IAEA.” In January, Germany, France and Britain invoked a dispute settlement mechanism to make a resolution not an easy condition to implement with the five-year agreement or to refer them to the UN Security Council. On Friday, his foreign ministers said to “seek a ministerial assembly to urge Iran to crown and evaluate our position” in the process.
If no solution is found, the procedure may also lead to the resumption of United Nations and European Union sanctions against Iran. But ministers warned that it would oppose Apple’s exit and force the reimposition of sanctions.
“We firmly believe that a large unilateral apple removal and provoking the resumption of UN sanctions would have serious negative consequences” in the UN Security Council, they said. “We do not support such a resolution that would be inconsistent with our current efforts to maintain jcPOA.”
“O item.title”