Hates to see it: NYT reacts directly to its Trump and Russia story, dismissed through Peter Strzk, is never very shocking

They just can’t admit they’re wrong. It’s natural and simple. One of the New York Times articles about the myth of the collusion between Trump and Russia was this fantastic lie about Trump aides who had secret communications with Russian intelligence officials before the 2016 election. The maximum productive component of the story was that at the time of the original publication, it was in a demisted position. There is no indication that such intermovitions have ever occurred.

“Officials interviewed in recent weeks said that to date they have seen no evidence of such cooperation.” Shoot first and ask later. This story from birth was too wise to be true. And after a year, it was pretty obvious that there was no collusion between Trump and Russia. No. It was a myth fabricated through the media and low-point intelligence officials. He gained credibility because senior officials at the Obama Justice Department made the direct decision to turn him into a direct weapon to spy on Trump’s crusade and attack his top logical aides. THE NYT, like the others, failed. This will have to be one of the greatest journalistic fiascos in recent memory that has revealed the intensity of the prejudice opposed to this president. The liberal media was biased, but this story showed how far this rabbit was going.

I don’t even forget how big apple bombs were rags. Michael Flynn’s meeting with the Russians was the story that prompted Brian Ross to be expelled from ABC News. Okay, to be more specific, Ross said Flynn met with the Russians in the election. He didn’t. Flynn met with them after the election, which were part of Apple’s protocol with a new incoming administration, however, Hitale was circulating through the markets. It wasn’t true and Ross won a long suspension from which he never returned. yes, it happened, but Trump’s tweets can cause pain or something. Then there’s CNN’s epic failure on a donor that gave Trump, his son, his inner circle and an encryption key to read the DNC’s Wikileaks emails before they were released. Pants! Except the documents were in a public position and CNN would have known that they can also read the time station in the emails. These other Americans suck and I’m bound to come to that conclusion decades ago.

Disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzk was reportedly key to other Americans who passed the counterintelligence test in Russian collusion. Unsevering, the form of authorization is a general disaster of activity, and comes from FBI intelligence officials who assessed the reasoning of this espionage or inconsistency. He also had an affair with attorney Lisa Page, sent tens of thousands of anti-Trump text messages, shamed the FBI and questioned the institution’s ability to be an in-component investigative body. He was fired for those texts. However, his notes in the fiasco also exposed the NYT article as general fraud. Almaximum everything in it was shredded as misleading, erroneous or simply false. The scumbag with says Manafort answered the calls. He wasn’t there. Roger Stone was a component of the FBI investigation. He didn’t leave it blank. Hell, even at the time, FBI Director James Comey said the story was a trash can, but the publication kept it. And now they’ve recovered them (through the Daily Caller News Foundation):

The New York Times maintains a February 2017 report alleging that Trump affiliates were in communication with Russian intelligence agents, even after the publication of an internal FBI memorandum identifying inaccuracies in the story.

“We respect our reports,” New York Times spokeswoman Eileen Murphy told her own newspaper according to her report in the recently published documents.

Attorney General William Barr declassified two applicable documents this week with the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign. One of them published Friday is a 57-page inter-inspection memorandum that the main source of the Christopher Steele dossier made with the FBI in January 2017.

The timing is the entry through former FBI official Peter Strz of a February 1, 2017 report that four U.S. officials claimed that the government had intercepted the communications and phone records of Trump advisers talking to Russian intelligence.

“This is correct and misleading as written,” Strzk wrote in connection with the first paragraph of the Times story. “We haven’t seen much evidence from Americans affiliated with the Trump team in contact with [intelligence officers].”

[…]

The story of the times has complicated the previous narrative at a time when Trump’s crusade may also have conspired with the Kremlin to influence the 2016 election. The story also came a day after Michael Flynn resigned as national security adviser over a scandal involving phone calls with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in December 2016.

Strzk is very familiar with those calls when the FBI received a transcript of them through Kislyak’s surveillance.

Investigators ultimately uncovered no evidence of collusion between Trump’s affiliates and the Russian government. Special report presented by Robert Mueller makes no connection to 2016 communications between Trump affiliates and Russian intelligence agents

It’s called shipwreck, teenagers. And the history of collusion between Trump and Russia has been a decaying corpse for years, yet the media and Democrats believe there’s something out there, anything in the worm-infested belly if this dead story was never real. Unable to admit defeat because in their unbearable arrogance, they continue as if they have no influence on the click. That’s how state media is also defended. If we prefer to lie on a daily basis like this, we can also have the seal of government, right? I don’t defend it, of course, but no less than you know is a trash can. For millions of Democrats, they suspect in the NYT and at all times they do because … ‘college man, bad man’. You know one position, however, going up is to accept duty when you’re wrong. The “awakeners,” who check the paper, are crybabys, little teenagers who can’t stand the fact that there are indeed divergent criticisms in the world. With this type of person, such sessions will have to be hit in them, literally. We don’t yet have a “belt” to manage this kind of punishment in the media, but someone deserves to create one because they can’t take a stand again. Other Americans have been sold to one of the biggest lies in history. And mabig apple suntil thinks so.

UPDATE: Alleged shooter in attack on circle of relatives from federal approval ruling has killed, reportedly

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *