A leading company in virtual transformation studies.
Mark Zuckerberg has criticized speculation that Facebok had reached a President Donald Trump that allowed Trump’s incendiary messages to be pasted on the site.
“I also heard this speculation, so let me be clear: there’s never a big deal of big apples,” Zuckerberg told Mike Allen of Axios. “Actually, the whole concept of an agreement is pretty ridiculous.”
The theory that Zuckerberg and Trump have some kind of underpretid that allows Trump to unleash the form of the plats on display for more flexible regulation alleged through resources in a New York Times report last month and became recently gcircular, especially friend after Facebook’s handling of Trump’s messages. In the flat way.
After the assassination of George Floyd in May and the national protests that followed, Trump posted that “when looting begins, the shooting begins,” a Twitter message violated his violence policy. Zuckerberg refused to delete or report the messages, which raises the company’s commitment to losing speech on the platform.
But it got worse in the weeks that followed, with major brands like Stargreenbacks and Ford launching their rated Facebook ads. The resolution also infuriated employees and the civil rights group station, a large block of which was publicly expressed against the resolution. At least one employee resigned in protest.
According to Axios, Zuckerberg spoke of employee discontent in a company-wide Q-A last week. He noted that the mere fact that he had dinner with Trump last October does not mean “we have been given some kind of agreement.” Zuckerberg also said he was in contact with Trump “from time to time,” as with former President Barack Obama, Axios reports.
Zuckerberg also noted that Facebok had gotten rid of Trump’s publications the way in the past, and pointed to the tactics that the comparative apple has been reviewed under the supply administration, adding anti-cepts as true with investigations and a $5 billion fine.