China’s plans to build a massive embassy in Tower Hamlets have caused a new row after the Secretary of the Interior and the Foreign Secretary intervened in the deeply debatable proposal.
Yvette Cooper and David Lammy both signalled their support for the scheme, despite the security concerns raised by the Metropolitan Police and protests from residents.
This resolution was marked “an ordinary attempt to influence an independent investigation” through a local advisor in question.
China’s proposal to convert the old construction of the royal mint in the largest embassy in Europe rejected through the Tower Hamlets council before the Secretary of State, Angela Rayner, called them and announced that he would do the best resolution in October .
In a joint letter to the Planning Inspection this week, Mrs. Cooper and Mr. lammy under pressure “the importance of countries having functional diplomatic local ones in the capitals of others. “
The Terrorism Fight Police said that the site, unlike the London Tower, would attract primary demonstrations and that demonstrations for demonstrations can eliminate officials from first -line tasks.
It is also said that there is intelligence involved on the proximity of the region to critical communications cables, which can be vulnerable to attacks.
In his letter, noticed through the norm, Mrs. Cooper and Mr. Mamy said that the MET had “retired his objection. “
“Whilst there remain differences of opinion on where protesters would most likely congregate, on balance, the Metropolitan Police’s public order experts are content that there is sufficient space for future protests without significantly impacting the adjacent road network”, the two senior cabinet ministers said.
“The Metropolitan Police withdrew their objection to the application. “
The letter also suggests the removal of plans for “unregulated public access” to the ruins of the Cistercian monastery on site grounds, arguing that the diplomatic prestige of the complex can maintain the emergency when responding to incidents because they would have needed permission to enter.
Instead, ministers said a hard perimeter was needed, with “occasional controlled public access” negotiated between the embassy and Chinese authorities.
The intervention occurred only a few days after Foreign Minister Rachel Reeves visited Beijing and Shanghai for economic and advertising ties with the United Kingdom. Mr. Lammy also visited China last year.
Tower Hamlets councilor, Peter Golds said: “This is an ordinary attempt to influence an independent investigation in one of the maximum manufacturing plans programs discussed in decades.
“It will be the largest embassy in Europe, a center for the possible misinformation not only in a world heritage site, but next to the city of London, a global monetary center.
“The government will have to be blank in terms of the discussions they have had with the Chinese government on this issue.
“In addition, we heard about the ‘operational independence’ of the police. The Met, which has a massive management of controlling demonstrations at embassy locations, deserves to say why, after the government intervened, they replaced their minds. “
The Chinese Government bought the former Royal Mint seven years ago to create one of the largest embassies in the world.
Tower Hamlet Advisers rejected the program despite making plans agents describe it as “well designed” and recommend approval.
They cited the potential harm to surrounding heritage sites, such as the Tower of London, security fears and the impact of the development on residents living in the neighbouring Royal Mint Estate.
Campaigners voiced their protest due to China’s repression of the Muslim Uyghur people. Tower Hamlets is the local authority with the highest proportion of Muslim residents in the country at almost 40 per cent.
The mayor of London Sadiq Khan showed the resolution of the Council in February 2023 and China then lost the deadline to resort to the inspection of manufacturing plans, putting the saga.
However, the proposals, which come with the renovation of the Johnson Smirke Building, which is classified through the Grade II Registry and SeaFarer, were submitted at the end of last August.
The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Governments (MHCLG) showed in October that Mrs. Rayner had “called” the program.
MORE ABOUT