Advertisement
Supported by
Technologies that may have derailed the former president because they were implemented inappropriately or because the Secret Service decided not to use them.
By Eric Lipton and David A. Fahrenthold
Reporting from Washington
After a week of oversights and failures, officials who accompanied former President Donald J. Trump on a crusade in Butler, Pennsylvania, still had one last chance to get it right. The instance lasted about 30 seconds.
It all happened when a local police officer looked over the roof of the AGR International warehouse near the protest site and discovered the suspicious guy he and other officials were chasing. Ninety minutes of confusion about Thomas Crooks’ intentions and whereabouts ended in an instant.
“Long gun!” the officer broadcast on the police radio system, according to Secret Service testimony before Congress this week.
It was urgent news that immediately reached a command center shared by local police and the Secret Service, and then agents close enough to sell their bodies in front of Trump. They still had time to thwart an assassination attempt.
But the radio message reached the Secret Service, and 30 seconds later, Crooks fired his first shots.
This communication breakdown is one of many cases in which technologies that could have protected Mr. Trump against the July 13 shootings did not do so, either because they malfunctioned, because they were misused, or because the Service Secret didn’t use them in the first place.
We are recovering the content of the article.
Please allow javascript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we determine access. If you’re in gamer mode, exit and log into your Times account or subscribe to the full Times.
Thank you for your patience as we determine access.
Already subscribed? Sign in.
Do you want all the Times? Subscribe.
Advertisement