Study finds that real coronavirus infections are 10 times more consistent than official estimates

“O.itemList.length” “- this.config.text.ariaShown

“This.config.text.ariaFermé”

Asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 may be spreading the disease unknowingly, but to what extent? According to new data published in JAMA, the rate of coronavirus infection in different parts of the United States may be much higher than anyone thinks.

Since January, states have reported that they have all shown hot coronavirus times to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); However, there are more than 10 times more coronavirus infections than has been documented. Other humans with positive antibodies, or suspected markers of a previous infection, may not have developed symptoms, so they may have unknowingly spread the virus.

The study “corroborates other smaller previous studies” that show that “infection was a more frequent burden than previously thought,” said John Brownstein, an epidemiologist and professor of biomedical computing at Harvard Medical School.

The CDC’s highest recent estimate is that about 40% of infections come from other Americans who have no symptoms. This suggests that asymptomatic carriers of the virus may play a wonderful role in the transfer of netpaintings (the spread of the virus through an unknown source in an explicit region).

MORE: Coronavirus map: tracking the spread and circulating around the world

Recent top studies from the agency analyzed 10 cities and U.S. states, a big apple of which has h8 infection rates. In some regions, such as Missouri, it was estimated to be 13 times more consistent with a variety of times greater than reported, however, in other regions, such as New York, the difference between infections and reported times decreased over time, according to the breeding station suggesting an improvement in detection capacity. .

The concept of large-scale testing, even for those that are asymptomatic, has been proposed as a device rather than a preference to document infection rates. Countries such as Iceland, which have implemented competitive forms of screening and had the highest logic consistent with the world’s capita test rate, have controlled to involve viral propagation, consistent with the breeding station through mass testing. However, skeptics say that expanding coverage of false negatives (not detecting the virus when present) and coverage of false positives (not detecting the virus when absent) would cause more harm than good.

And despite an increase in the prevalence of coronavirus times in the population, “we can’t draw conclusions about collective immunity from that data,” Brownstein said.

The herd’s immunity, the assumption that a giant enough component of network paints is immune to disease to be tracked on its tracks, is the target of a large pandemic.

Brownstein said that “the full variety of other inflamed Americans is very low,” so “let’s see cases” before the virus is contained or there’s a vaccine. In addition, the result of several recent clinical trials anticipated that a possible vaccine is valid for several months.

MORE: COVID-1nine vaccine applicants demonstrate promising early results, however, the end line is a long way off

The study analyzed samples from other Americans who underwent regimen blood tests or were admitted to hospitals from March to May in 10 U.S. cities and states. However, during this period, Apple Mabig people who were able to travel to their physical care providers for regimen testing or elective procedures probably chose to stick the pandemic, and only those who had the highest risk in the hospital. Therefore, the blood samples included in the study may not have been representative of the general population.

Despite this limitation, Brownstein said he regarded it as “a surprisingly well-done study” that is helping us “better perceive COVID-1nine’s w8 at the netpainting level.” But even the figures captured through these researchers could “underestimate the true prevalence of the disease,” he added.

MORE: After a Delay, CDC disarm new rules on how states can safely reopen

Several recent clinical studies have hypothesized that once the infection, other Americans, especially friends with mild or nonexistent symptoms, might have antibodies that begin to decrease after only two or 3 months. Therefore, we may have even more information about the percentage of the population inflamed with the virus at some point, and knowledge from the CDC can only capture other Americans who have recently become inflamed.

Moreover, it is conceivable that with more undocumented infections, the mortality rate (the percentage of other humans with coronavirus dying for it) may not be at the estimated mortality level, which is lately 3.7% in the United States, however, experts say. that time alone assistance will reveal the real mortality rate. The perfect news is that as we see innovations in care, greater remedies and, in all likelihood, a vaccine, the mortality rate could continue to decline.

MORE: Other asymptomatic and presymptomatic Americans transmit maximum infections to COVID-19: study

The only way “we’re going to get out of this pandemic is to wear a mask, take social distance” and stick to other measures presented through the CDC, said Brownstein, “the best friend to those who are swollen and asymptomatic.”

Shantum Misra, M.D., is a senior resident of internal medicine at Dartmouth-Hitchcoc Medical Cinput and an associate of the ABC News Medical Unit.

Real coronavirus infections are probably 10 times more consistent than official estimates, according to a study found in abcnews.go.com

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *