Advertisement
Supported by
Zeynep Tumekci, David Wallace-Wells and Jessica Grose
By Jessica Grosezeynep Tumekci and David Wallace-Wells
Mrs. Tufekci is an opinion columnist. Mr. Wallace-Wells and Mrs. Grose are opinion editors.
Alexandra Siferlin, editor in chief of Fitness and Sciences for Times Opinion, organized a verbal exchange on Wednesday with the opinion columnist Zeynep Tumekci and the opinion writers David Wallace-Wells and Jessica Grose about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Social Services.
Alexandra Siferlin: A challenge for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at this audience was convincing the senators that he is not a conspiracy theorist that will eliminate each other’s vaccines. In his opening statement, he declared that it was not “anti -vacunation”, many examples received their long vaccine complaint, adding a burning exchange with Senator Bernie Sanders about the old non -profit organization of Kennedy promoting -Granouillères Vaccin.
Has Kennedy controlled to offer this insurance?
Jessica Grose: I will have to agree with Senator Ron Wyden, who said: “The receipts show that Mr. Kennedy followed the theories of conspiracy, the charlatans, the charlatans, in specific with respect to the security and effectiveness of Vaccines “. Do not do much to suppress the deep doubts that anyone who provides specific attention would have. That is, bad when he had to admit that “he probably made” once Lyme’s disease is a “biow army weapon. “
David Wallace-Wells: I don’t think he has convinced anyone, even if I don’t think he was given. He worked at Pete Hegseth and Brett Kavanaugh, defensive, interrupted, evasive and in a position to be Memed Game Book. He has not repudiated the statements beyond, only diverted and couples. More surprising to me: he has said almost nothing about how to return to the United States back.
Grose: David, I also discovered that I Kennedy has a audience that cares.
Zeynep Tumekci: He is very endowed with putting the questions and ready to do it. When asked if he is a conspiracy theorist, for example, he only said no and said he had been called the conspiracy to point out that vaccines do not avoid transmission. But that is not the genuine reason. For example, he falsely said that H. P. V. The vaccine increases cancer titles, and even potentially benefits from the legal action opposed to this vaccine. Meanwhile, the evidence shows that H. P. V. The vaccine eliminates the death of cervical cancer. But he does not address this.
We have recovering the content of the article.
JavaScript turn on in the configuration of your browser.
Thanks for your patience while we review access. If you are in reading mode, leave and attach to your Times account, or subscribe to all the time.
Thanks for your patience while we review access.
Already signed? Connect.
Do you want all the time? Subscribe.
Advertisement